Archive for the ‘Sleep’ Category


“What are you going to do about Charlie?”

So, my friend Judy – godparent to my children, one of approximately three people who have seen my entire nuclear family at its individual and collective highest highs and lowest lows over Sunday brunches and other occasions the past eight or so years – sent me a wee message a few nights ago on Facebook:

my stress dream last night: you had a 3rd baby (charlie) but you were bummed that he was interfering with the lovely dynamic that you had as a 4-some, so you mostly left him at home. (like, you would come for brunch and not bring him.) i spent the dream fussing about what to do about charlie and the million possibilities of what i could be/should be doing. you were so nonplussed about the whole thing. Oi. woke up exhausted and so wanted to write and say thanks for not having a third baby. xox. i told some people at work about the dream, and so now the code for any decisions i need to make about students is “what are you going to do about charlie?” ha ha

Now, we’ve been through this: it’s not like anyone around here was considering having a third baby. We are a house of big kids now, the rhythms and needs of babies and toddlers vague, distant memories. Pregnant women, women with babies, look so young to me now, so unbroken, so sweet with their strollers and their round-faced children with those tummies who don’t know how to open doors. We are a house wherein, most of the time, most people sleep through the night in their own beds and wipe their own bums. Etc. Simply put, we are a household that is — more to the point, we are two 40-plus parents that are —no longer equipped to handle the crazy that would be another baby, a third child.

And yet, there’s something slightly disconcerting when other people are having stress dreams about me having another baby. I mean, I realize that dreams are dreams and open to interpretation, but still. It makes you wonder about the kind of angst I must have projected into the world as the mother of infants.

Because, as I recall, there was some angst. Or, as Judy put it in our ongoing chat, “Can you imagine if you had another baby????? Oi. the sleepless nights the feeding the helplessness. i get panicky just thinking about it for you. or maybe anyone.”

So, the short version is: we are going to do nothing about Charlie. And yet still, there it was, there it is: a tiny part of my brain that immediately thought, “Oooh, sweet baby Charlie! Mama would never forget to take woodums you to brunch!”

 


Manny Poppins of the Night

When the kids were babies and I was three-quarters (okay, seven-eighths. Maybe nine-tenths) psychotic with sleep deprivation, I used to fantasize about hiring a sleep nanny, someone to come into the house in the early evening and do whatever it took to get them to sleep through the night in their own beds.

And where would I be during this sleep training, you ask? Somewhere else: maybe in the basement, maybe ensconced in the spare room of some understanding friend, maybe, in a pinch, at a hotel. Anywhere except near the screaming and the dreadmiserypanic that engulfed me after being awakened constantly, relentlessly, night after night.

I don’t think there were any actual sleep nannies in Thunder Bay at the time (there was that nurse at the health unit who called me back, twice, to chastise me about even considering letting my baby “cry it out,” but I don’t think she counted), and I’m not sure that I would have been able to stomach coughing up several hundred dollars a night for the privilege of having one (although, really? In hindsight, it would have been worth every penny in terms of preserving my mental health and my shortening telomeres). But I fantasized about them, these Mary Poppinses of the night, fantasized about bunking down somewhere orderly and quiet while someone else instilled decent sleep patterns in my children.

Reader? Seven and a half years after becoming a parent, the fantasy has been fulfilled.

You may recall that Rachel and I took off for Copenhagen at the beginning of May, and that Rob stayed with the children. But I have neglected to mention until now that Rob — who shall henceforth be known as “He who trained the untrainable” — also spearheaded and saw out Isaac’s long-overdue move out of my room and back into his own.

Had I not mentioned recently that Isaac moved into our room in October of *cough* 2010? As in, for the past 18 months, a small child has slept, with varying degrees of soundness, in a little bed next to his mommies’ big bed. Mostly, his tenure of bunking with us has been marked by certain amount of relief, but mostly by grudging acceptance on my part, and often by sheer frustration. For several months, it seemed that he was there by the very skin of his teeth, especially during the weeks upon weeks of nights during which he still woke up multiple times to kvetch about the state of his pillows and the fact that we still would not let him cross the line from his mattress to ours.

(I did empathize with his frustration. I mean, he’d got so far, only to be thwarted at the last great divide: out of his room and into ours, from a stingy air mattress on the floor to a foam bed, to the foam bed topped with the stingy air mattress. Onto which he piled pillows so that he would be at the same level as — if not just slightly higher than — us. Like a cat asserting its dominance. And then, he’d slowly, slowly sneak his head onto our mattress. From his vantage point, the logical next step was obvious: just roll over into the maternal bed and cuddle on up.

From our vantage point, he had to stay on his own bloody mattress so as to avoid scuffing our shins with the slip-proof bottoms of his footed pajamas.

At least, until after 6 AM, when nobody felt like arguing anymore.)

“He is so out of here,” I muttered pretty much daily. And Rachel would nod and look concerned and say, “I hear what you’re saying. You sound pretty frustrated.” Which is basically a line out of the Parenting 101 script that means, essentially, “I’m going to acknowledge your unhappiness in an attempt to satisfy your needs without actually changing anything.”

Her point was that at least she didn’t have to actually get out of bed in order to deal with the wake-ups. I countered — neglecting to acknowledge that it was my idea to bring him into our room in the first place — that we should force Isaac to sleep in his own damn bed, in his own damn room, all through the night, so that we wouldn’t have to get up in the middle of the night at all. Ever. Of course, I had no suggestions for how to actually make that happen, given that Isaac had successfully resisted all known forms of sleep training for the school of I’ll Do What I Damn Well Please, to the point where we started calling him “Isaac the Untrainable” (a moniker later adopted by our friends for their two-year-old daughter, who was Totally Not Down with spending the entire night in her toddler bed).

But by the time May rolled around, we were both fairly fed up with sharing our space with Isaac. By this point, it had become a habit rather than a necessity, but neither of us could actually stomach the thought of losing the several nights’ sleep that would inevitably accompany the switch.

Enter Rob. Whose basic condition for staying with the kids for nine days while we went to Europe was that he not have to sleep in the same room as Isaac. I’m not sure if this had anything to do with Rob’s own sleep preferences or if it was simply a way to get us to get the kid out, but it seemed like as good an opportunity as any to cut the cord. The clincher, though, was that Rob offered to be our sleep nanny (or should I say “manny”?): You girls go off to Europe, he said, and when you come back, the transition will be complete. Or something to that effect.

(This is usually the point in the conversation where all my female friends with husbands and children — you know who you are — start seriously re-contemplating their life choices and wondering if it’s too late to enlist a sperm donor retroactively.)

Not that I didn’t help. The day before we left, I dug out and hung up (using fun, fun power tools) the crazy bed canopy with glow-in-the-dark stars I had purchased online in a moment of hopefulness. And because the canopy looked a little too stark, I jazzed it up with some red and yellow ribbon accessories. I stuck glow-in-the-dark stars all over the ceiling. And I made up the bed with kid-friendly sheets. And then, Rob went out and bought not one but two crazy-ass nightlights, the four-year-old equivalent of a Zeppelin-inspired sound and light experience. I mean, what kid wouldn’t want to sleep in this?

That kid would be Isaac.

Oh, he liked his new bedroom. But he liked it as, he told us, as a place to visit, not a place to actually spend the night, alone. But we persisted, persisted right through the hours and hours of screaming and protesting through the wee hours of the night until we snuck out of the house, shattered, at 6 AM, to go to the airport. Never have I been so happy to get to an airport, to a plane that would take me far, far away from the children. Rob texted me from the airport at 6:30 AM: “Isaac awake. Says to tell you he slept in his bed the whole night so he gets a star.”

I texted back: “Tell him to go fuck himself.”

From there, however, things got better. I mean, Copenhagen. A basic tenet of life is that going to Copenhagen with your girlfriend is always better than listening to your nearly-five-year-old scream from 2 AM to 4 AM in Thunder Bay, Ontario. But each day, we received text updates from Rob on the progressively better quality of Isaac’s nights in The Room. And if Copenhagen was the cake, then the inch-thick frosting was the idea of coming home to a kid to not only (a) slept through the night in his own room, but (b) did so happily and (c) fell asleep on his own without needing or even agitating for someone to lie down next to him.

We’ve been working on the early mornings. Now, the deal is that he can’t come in until his alarm goes off (or, as he puts it, “My clock starts talking to me”). At 6:35 AM, mind you, but this is still an improvement. A few mornings ago, I woke up early to pee and found him lying on the floor outside our bedroom, sucking his thumb and cuddling his blanket. “How long have you been here?” I asked him. “Oh,” he said, “only about half the night.”

“Great,” I whispered. “Come get us when your alarm goes off.” And I went back to bed. In my own room. With my door closed and nobody but Rachel beside me.


Not a single resolution in this post

Well, hello there, 2012. I missed your debut, of course: I have not voluntarily stayed up until midnight for approximately seven years now, but on this particular New Year’s eve I flopped into bed at about 9 PM in the hopes of catching at least a few solid hours of sleep before our 3:30 AM wake-up call.

Of course, there was no solid sleep to be had. My brain is tricky like that: faced with a wee-hours deadline, it tends to go into panic mode, calculating and then recalculating at regular intervals throughout the night just how many potential hours of sleep the body that houses it may or may not get and at what point it might just be a good idea to cut everyone’s losses and wake up anyway and stumble through the rest of the day like a grouchy zombie.

Fortunately, at this point in my life, I am wise to my brain’s proclivities and have learned how to mostly ignore it. I imagine it as a gerbil running frantically to nowhere in its wheel. “Cute little gerbil,” I think to it, “you just go and run away over there until you’ve tired yourself out and meanwhile I will focus on my breathing.” This mindset, while far from perfect, is still a vast improvement over the sheer panic that constituted my mental life when Rowan was a newborn and the scarce chance I had to sleep uninterrupted (more formally known as hours between 3 and 8 AM when Rachel was on duty; I had the 9 PM to 3 AM shift) was entirely spent joining my brain on its gerbil wheel to nowhere, fuming and angsting about how tired I was and would be and would always be and whose idea was this baby anyway. (I remember writing thank-you notes for the piles and piles of gifts we got when he was born and suppressing the urge to write, just once, “Thank you for the so-called ‘sleeper.’ Unfortunately, it does not work and we are returning it. Please send a functioning one.”)

And now, I just think, Well, this sucks, but the worst thing about it is that I’m going to be tired tomorrow.

PERSPECTIVE. TOTALLY. RULES.

Okay, fine, but where were you going at 3:30 in the morning, Susan? Well, Toronto, of course. And Cleveland, obviously. Followed ultimately by Florida, where we finally stopped. And stayed for a glorious week of lounging and swimming and ping-pong and Solitaire playing. (“If we just moved to Cleveland,” Rowan mused as we climbed onto our third airplane of the day, “then it would take a lot less time to get to Florida.” This is true. It is also true that perhaps we should have booked our flights a little earlier on in the season. And it is also true that it was a lot nicer when there were direct flights to Minneapolis from Thunder Bay, but I’m not in charge of that.)

Our first night in Florida, the kids’ grandparents ever so graciously babysat (a favour they granted twice more during the week we were there, bless them) while Rachel and I bucked up and went out for our now-traditional dinner at the totally awesome Rhythm Café in West Palm Beach with Fiona and Jen, Toronto friends whom we see, naturally, only in Florida. (Increasingly, this seems to be the way things roll in my circles: why would you see someone in Winnipeg or Toronto when South Beach or Deerfield or Delray beckon?) “Fake it till you make it,” Rachel and I vowed to each other as we got in the car and navigated the I-95, bowing to the premise that if we acted well rested, we would be. It totally worked: the four of us ate and bitched about travel and — lovingly — our children and caught up in general and then rounded out the meal with three desserts and four forks ( the peanut butter pie was the surprise favourite). Our waitress looked like Leslie Feist (I told her that and she had never heard it before). And you know what? After 18 consecutive hours of wakefulness, we closed the place. Because, apparently, what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger.

Happy 2012!

 

The very rare spoonbill we saw at the Wakodahatchee Wetlands.

 

And the alligator lurking not 10 feet away. And I thought, "This could end badly."


Maybe it means “You behaved badly in a previous life”

I’ve been going through some old journals recently and came across this description of a recent morning:

Sunday, 11 September, 2011, 7:10 AM

Moved over to the bed in Isaac’s room at 2 AM, after he woke us (“Can you cuddle me?”) and I couldn’t fall back asleep. He woke me an hour ago because he wanted some “private reading time” in his own bedroom. Because, you know, he can read and all. After he kicked me out, I went back to my own bedroom, where Rachel was lying in Isaac’s little bed because he had crowded her out of our bed. So I crawled in with her. And then Isaac wandered in, asking if anyone would read to him or play War with him, and we said no. And then he berated us for cuddling together, without him, and crawled in between us, which was sweet for a while but eventually got too crowded and so I left.

This is a metaphor for something, but I’m not sure what.

 


Octoberrific!

It’s October. Shut UP. No, really. Not even October: mid-October. I know — crazy.

It’s been like that, lately, where I think something that happened last weekend happened the weekend before. Or the one before that. Or, say, last month. Which was September. And in September, we just got kind of busy. It hadn’t occurred to me that we weren’t busy in the summer but, clearly, I had no idea, what with second grade and junior kindergarten and preschool and babysitters and music and sports and Hebrew school and the like and why do I feel all of a sudden like I live on planet Suburban Mother? Because I do. I live on planet Suburban Mother in September October and thank GOD for our calendar with its very large squares and stickers, the calendar that is designwise a blight on my delicate aesthetic senses but without which I would not survive.

Excuse me while I go fill the station wagon and get that meatloaf in the oven.

Yeah, so we’ve been Septemberized. I just made up that word. And, actually, it was a lovely month, gone all tickety-boo (cf CALENDAR; also setting the alarm). A lovely month made lovelier by a certain four-year-old’s 180° shift in attitude about extracurricular (not to mention curricular) activities. Last September was dominated by Isaac’s utter misery over preschool, his sheer dread of which permeated every waking moment. But this year? This year, he has scampered off gladly to every new activity and classroom September has thrown at him: five new things in one week, and the kid who held onto my leg and sobbed last year walked in, cracking jokes, only looking up to say, “You can go now, Mommy.”

And so we went.

I should point out, however, that this newfound independence has not extended into sleeping arrangements. In other words, Isaac is still sleeping in our room, curled up happy as can be on a single mattress next to ours. It’s been at least a year, now, minus a brief but valiant effort on Rachel’s part this past summer to get him back into his own room. (“But then we wouldn’t have a guest room,” I protested, completely inured by then to the idea of a child depriving me of a bedside table for the foreseeable future. I needn’t have worried, given that Isaac has historically, and successfully, resisted all known forms of sleep training for the school of I’ll Do What I Damn Well Please, to the point where we started calling him “Isaac the Untrainable” (a moniker since adopted by our friends for their two-year-old daughter, who is Totally Not Down with spending the entire night in her toddler bed).)

At this point, though, I will admit that it might indeed be nice to sleep through the night in my own room while Isaac sleeps through the night in his. Instead, he wakes at some point in the middle of the night several times a week and, depending on what side of the bed he wakes on (get it? Ha ha), requires varying degrees of coddling to go back to sleep. A few nights ago, he wanted Rachel to cuddle him, but reluctantly settled for her holding his hand. Except that (and don’t tell him this) he wasn’t really holding her hand. Realy, he was holding my hand in the dark while Rachel stayed securely on her side of the bed, murmuring aphorisms to him like Cyrano de Bergerac about how nice it was to hold his hand, too. He finally let go, saying, “Rachel, you don’t have to hold my hand as long as you stay right next to me.” “Okay,” she said, and we all went back to sleep again. We’re totally winning this one, obviously.


I can haz compromise

O cosleepers! We have once again joined your ranks!

All right, who am I kidding? We’ve been cosleeping in various forms for months, now. It’s just that we’ve finally given in and consolidated the process, wrestling the spare bed up from the basement and — when a certain three-year-old deemed it “too low” — topping it with a single air mattress so that he could nestle in beside us and feel secure enough to sleep through the night. He shoves a pillow into the gap between the beds, spreads his blanket over it, and then sleeps, or tries to, at least, on the blanket-on-the-pillow, so as to be even closer to us. I am reminded of how he slept as a tiny infant, only on his back on a pillow between us. And how I thought, then, what happens when he grows?

Now I know.

Are we suckers or intensely practical? Tomato, to-mah-toe: Does it matter, as long as we are sleeping?

Ah. But. About that, that sleeping thing. You think we’d be doing more of it. Maybe we are. Maybe we aren’t. It’s hard to say. The pro of the arrangement — interior design aesthetics, obviously, aside — are that we can “parent throughout the night” (kthnxbai, Dr. Sears) without actually having to get out of bed. The con is that we are, still, parenting a fair bit throughout the night. But at least that means we can rub Isaac’s tummy or his back and shush him, and hope that he will, as we put it, “thunk back to sleep.” Sometimes he does, sometimes he doesn’t. Sometimes the thunking involves much rearranging of the blanket on the pillow and much gentle suggesting that perhaps this is not a viable arrangement. Which is met with much resistance.

It is, I admit, quite lovely to look over at his little sleeping body in the middle of the night. It’s like a little gift, a prize. But — and you can colour me grouchy on this one — it’s still a consolation prize. Like, as the lovely and amazing Rachel Turiel puts it, “walking away with the veggie chopamatic … when you really wanted the new car, or simply to still be asleep.”


Things I/like/a hole in the head

Hey, you know what I really like doing? I really like arguing with a three-year-old at 3 AM — and again at 5:30 AM — about the fact that I am not his other mother. “I know that you want Rachel,” I say to him sweetly. “I know that. But right now all you have is me.” I agree; Rachel is better than me and absolutely, I should go to jail because I am not her. But first, I will lie quietly beside him as he glowers and then, grudgingly, sighs and snuggles up to me. Because I like to.

I also really like being elbowed in the clavicle by the nearly-six-year-old in my bed at 4 AM. It’s also fun to be poked in the ribs by the same child, particularly after I have just managed to fall back asleep after the clavicle incident. “Since I’m awake,” I tell him, “why don’t we really have some fun and you stick your icy little feet into the backs of my thighs?” And he obliges. Because he is a sweetheart.

It is nice, I find, to be punched in the head by a sleeping three-year-old after coaxing him back to sleep after convincing him that he is, indeed, doing me a favour by letting me sleep in his bed rather than in, say, my own. While it is slightly more peaceful to lie with his head shoved into my armpit as he lies perpendicular to me across the bed, I find the random punches invigorating and good training for the unexpected, well, punches, that life throws at you.

I like it when I wake up in the night and Rachel is not there and I get to play the “Where’s Rachel?” guessing game in my head. Is she cuddling the six-year-old or the three-year-old? Or maybe it’s just a simple case of insomnia and she decided to try the couch? Or maybe she just had to pee. Sometimes, when she accidentally wakes me up after trying to return to her own bed after cuddling one child or another, I get to ask her where she’s been, and she tells me. And it’s nice to be able to have these intimate conversations in the middle of the night.

If I’m really lucky, Rachel bounces out of our bed to deal with Isaac just as Rowan bounces into it. I find that symmetry appealing, although I’m still working with Rowan on the concept of symmetry as it relates to you stay on your half of the bed and I stay on mine. It is sweet, really, how he either spreadeagles over three quarters of the queen-sized surface of the mattress or insists on glomming his chilly little body directly onto mine — stomach to stomach, there is no spooning for this kid, that would be too symmetrical — in order to suck all my warmth. Because conventions like symmetry are boring! They are as boring as, say, going to bed without wearing sequined princess slippers and shoving two security blankets down the front of your dinosaur-footed pajamas in order to achieve that coveted Tweedledum look must be to Isaac. As boring as it must be to sleep through an entire night without waking up to ask one of your mothers, at 5 AM, “When I go to school tomorrow, will you pick me up outside?”

“Yes, honey, I would be glad to pick you up outside.”

But not as glad as I am to be woken up in the morning by… Darth Vader!

It’s a banner night when I get to sleep in — okay, when I get to lie down in —four different beds, all in the same night. I like the interesting dreams that occur between each move, but I also really like those times when I lie awake and feel sorry for all the boring, boring, symmetrical, sleeping people. I like that Rowan has enjoyed the Lemony Snickett books thus far so much that his dreams are now so vivid and intense that the only thing that allows him to go and stay asleep is the presence of a warm, maternal, body next to his. “It’s like you’re my bodyguard,” he told me last night at 9:24 PM. “Or maybe my dream guard.” And who wouldn’t like to be a dream guard?

“Do you think dream catchers work?” he asked me.

“Yes, I think they do,” I said. “I think that they make people feel better because then they don’t have to worry about the bad dreams and they can just dream about all the good things that there are, like Halloween and climbing trees and gymnastics and Bakugans and swinging hand-over-hand on the monkey bars at school and popcorn day and reading good books and brothers and mommies and the cats and chicken and rice—”

“Chicken and rice?” he said. “Absolutely not chicken and rice. Chicken and rice is absolutely out of the question.”

“Well,” I said, “you really liked eating it for dinner tonight.”

“But I don’t want to dream about it,” he said. “You don’t dream about food.”

Maybe you don’t, I thought.

“Tell me more nice things to dream about,” he said. “Tell me about things I like.”


The summer of his discontent

This is Isaac. 

And this is Isaac by about 3:30 PM on a day where he has not napped.

He’s three years old. He’s losing the nap. This is a natural, expected phenomenon; a routine developmental step. It’s just that I wish he didn’t have to be so astonishingly grumpy about the process. He comes home from the babysitter’s and immediately finds his blanket and drapes himself over the sofa or his bed or across the kitchen floor on a little blanket nest, removing his thumb from his mouth only to tell you that everything you do is wrong. Like singing. Or breathing. Or taking his picture.

As the late afternoon wears on, he winds himself up into a hyper fit of exhaustion that generally stops when he slams himself into a wall and crumples into a sodden mass of desperate tears and we carry him upstairs, howling “I NOT going to sleep! I NOT going to SLEEP!”

“Of course you’re not, buddy,” we tell him, lying him down and slipping pajamas onto him. “Of course you’re not.”


Fifteen years, or, There are two types of people…

Way back in the early days of the Internet, circa 1998 or so, Rachel and I, egged on by some friends (hi, M & H!), took an online personality survey, one of those Kinsey-type things, with approximately 100 questions that asked things like whether we picked the phone up on the first ring or let it go always to machine (machine! See how old the survey was — not voicemail, but machine!). Based on your answers, it then classified you into one of four personality types, and from there, into one of four further subtypes.

I would stake Isaac in a bet that Rachel and I answered every single question differently. You just have to trust me on this. We operate differently. And yet, AND YET … this computer program gave us not only the same personality type but also the same subtype. Meaning that, out of 16 possible configurations, we got the same one. (If math is your thing, tell me if I’ve got the odds of that correct.) Further, it wasn’t as though the whole world was equally divided among four personality types, further subdivided: the site explained that some types were much rarer than others. And that our type was very rare.

Our type?

Master controller.

This is essentially a metaphor for our relationship as a whole. We are both in charge, all the time, albeit in radically different ways. Fifteen years in, maybe we’ve mellowed. Maybe now we’re just apprentice controllers. In any case, we have mostly managed to make this work for us. Sometimes the aggression is too passive, sometimes we go for stretches where the passion loses some of its passion and then we aggressively work on finding the passion again. Occasionally the aggression is downright aggressive — or sometimes quite passionate, depending on your viewpoint — but, well … mostly it’s a tightly run ship around here. (Those of you who have witnessed the household firsthand will refrain from the comments section.)

(Oh, and although it’s too soon to say, I would stake Rowan in a bet that we are well on our way to raising another generation of master controllers. Just a hunch.)

Anyway, I’ve been thinking about the ways in which Rachel and I are similar, and how we’re different. My sense is that we operate in a very small spectrum of similarity — and that within that spectrum, the differences are vast. In other words, we are a lot alike, but so close that the differences are noticeable. Or something like that. For the record, however, here are some of the ways in which we are fraternal:

1. Her: Gratification. Me: Deferral of. Rachel is really, really good at relaxing, whereas I am really, really good at doing the seven or eight things that need to get done before I can relax. Which usually means that I never end up relaxing, because by the time I get around to it, it’s time to go to bed. Rachel does not fold laundry while watching television. Rachel eats chocolate at the outset of an unpleasant task, and I fold T-shirts to Glee, while bouncing on my exercise ball.

2. Her: Scrabble. Me: Boggle. She claims that Boggle is too loud, and I claim that Scrabble is too long. In truth, they are our childhood games and we are loyal to them. And we can cream each other at our own games.

3. Rachel loses things and I find them. I was going to write, “I am the finder and Rachel is the…” but that seemed mean. But I can’t tell you how many conversations in our house goes something like:  Rachel: “Where are my—?” Susan: “Kitchen counter, next to the teapot.”

4. Her: Could sleep on a pile of rocks. Me: Earplugs, eye mask, 600 thread-count sheets, cats locked in the basement, the right pillows, utter and complete darkness and silence. This difference explains, in part, the next one:

5. Her: Camping. Me: Would rather be shot in the head.

6. Although we’re both omnivores, Rachel has been quicker to embrace the culinary traditions of my people — Eastern European Jews — than I have to embrace those of hers: the Brits. Although she maintains that she does not like a good brisket, she is completely on board for gefilte fish, matzoh ball soup, lox and cream cheese (although we both concede that the Scots do a fine job with smoked salmon, too), rugelach, hamantaschen, etc. I., however, am not so good with custard, boiled suet puddings in bags with lots of raisins, fried Mars bars and the like. I like Yorkshire pudding and a good roast beef, but I’m not orgasmic about them. (Unless the roast beef is really, really rare.) We are both, however, equally passionate about Indian food, which is, really, what the British seem to do best. And we are both horrified by kishke.

7. We have different shoe sizes. This is likely a good thing, because if we wore the same size shoes, I could see us violating our vow not to share clothes (because that is just SUCH a slippery slope) and going all Carrie-Bradshaw-meets-John-Fluevog. And then we probably wouldn’t be able to feed the children.

8. Rachel pretends not to enjoy musical theater but secretly adores it, while I pretend not to like our grey tabby cat, but secretly don’t like our grey tabby cat. It’s just that she (the cat, not Rachel, who has personality in spades — she is, after all, the Queen of Irony) has no personality. Seriously, the cat is a cipher. There is no there there. She’s nearly transparent, except when she stands, oozing of blandness, in front of my computer monitor and obstructs my view of my work. She had serious potential as a kitten, and then completely fizzled out. It’s sad. It really is.

9. Rachel has fine, straight hair and  I. Do. Not. And I am jealous. Rachel has the hair I have spent my entire life coveting. Instead, I make do with lots of products, the master scissors of one Jimi Imij, hairstylist to the gods at Coupe Bizarre on Queen West in Toronto (and yes, I still travel to get my hair cut, because Jimi thins it out like nobody’s business; it looks like somebody had a litter of kittens on the floor by the time he’s done), and a straightening iron. This difference may also contribute to difference #5 above: it’s hard to enjoy camping when your hair immediately turns to crap.

10. When I cook, I follow the recipe. When Rachel cooks, she deviates. It’s a point of pride — she has to substitute one spice for another, double the cream, mess with the ratio of flour to sugar, etc. She can’t not do that. Rachel also likes to hover when I cook, asking questions like, “Did you put in the cumin?” “Yes,” I will say, “I put in the quarter teaspoon of cumin that the recipe called for.” “Oh,” she’ll say, “and what are you doing with those onions?” “I am going to fry them,” I will say, “just like it says to in the recipe.” “Oh,” she’ll say, “and—” and I will say, “The recipe is right there, and I think you should read it.” She maintains that she is simply making conversation, but I know she’s secretly itching to modify my recipe. (That sounds so suggestive, “Baby, can I modify your recipe?”) I’m all for improvisation, but I tend to reserve my improvisational skills for making up silly songs to sing to the kids. I do, however, double the vegetables in any recipe, because my mother told me to. And she was right.

Still, we eat well.


Swedish for “sleep when you’re dead”

Back in the days when IKEA charged a flat fee of $35 to deliver any amount of furniture anywhere in Canada, Rachel ordered an entire one-bedroom’s apartment worth of BILLY bookcases and EKTORP desks and other loveseats-with-names to furnish her apartment in Thunder Bay. Among those items was a double box spring and mattress set — I forget its name, so let’s just call it LARS — that she used for the year until I and the rest of our furniture moved up from the Big Smoke to join her. We put LARS in what would eventually be Rowan’s room and graduated to a queen-size Sealy Posturepedic of our own.

The thing is — as I remembered this morning, all snuggled up in what has become my five-year-old’s bed — LARS is the most comfortable bed in the house. Our Posturepedic is fine and all, but it does not have the Scandinavian je ne sais quoi, the perfect sleepability of LARS. LARS, like the baby bear’s bed, is just right. Plus, when a child arrives at one in the morning for a cuddle and subsequently settles in for the night, I really wish we had sprung for the king-size mattress. Things get a little crowded. Which is why, last night, I left Rachel and Rowan in the Sealy and decamped for LARS, quite happy to be ensconced underneath a sailboat comforter in a comfy bed all to myself.

At least, until 5:30 AM, when Isaac woke up to hurl abuse at me and needed resettling and Rachel stumbled into Rowan’s room to say she had been awake since three.

“Do you want to climb in here?” I asked, on my way out of bed to shush Isaac.

“No,” she said. “Well, yes.” And she snuggled up in LARS while I got to go listen to the two-year-old complaint department gripe that I wasn’t Rachel and where was Rachel and he wanted Rachel not me so I should just go in the garbage. Which I took as my cue to return to Rachel and LARS, for another 45 minutes. “This is the garbage,” I told her, and we both fell back to sleep.

Things could be worse, though. These days, Isaac is more or less sleeping through the night again, after an incredibly tedious few months of waking twice or three times and calling out for us. We finally dealt with that problem, however, with the highly controversial technique of RIDING IT OUT AND WAITING TO SEE IF THINGS WOULD CHANGE ALL BY THEMSELVES. Which they did. I’m going to write a best-selling book about how you can do that with your two-year-old, too.

Funny, though, how much things have changed when it comes to sleep. In my parenting incarnation of a few years, or even months, back, I would have been planning, strategizing, spending the precious little energy I have left coming up with a plan, A PLAN, to get the baby to sleep. I would have been trading off nights with Rachel in the basement in order to ensure that we were both at least half-rested.

At this point, though, we seem to be wise enough — and well-rested enough, and, let’s not forget, healthy enough — that we can take the stretches of interrupted nights more or less in stride. I chalk it up partly to increased levels of Zen, but also fatality: what, really, could we have done to prevent the child from waking up? And what else was there to do but help get him back to sleep? And then go back to sleep ourselves, wherever and however we could? I like it, this new Zen. It’s so much better than hysteria. Really, it’s just — and don’t kill me for this one — common sense.