Archive for March, 2010


You have to read this book …

… because the Gay & Lesbian Review said so. Just now:

With this diverse, poignant, and sometimes very funny anthology, editors Susan Goldberg and Chloe Brushwood Rose attempt to get beyond the mainstream media’s often superficial coverage of the “gayby boom.” Here, they give several writers a chance to discuss their own experiences on various alternative paths to procreation, outside of the hetero nuclear family norm. A couple of the chapters in And Baby Makes More are fairly straightforward descriptions of lesbian moms selecting a known sperm donor and proceeding to get knocked up. But the anthology acknowledges that queer procreation is, by its very nature, very complex and full of potential pitfalls. There are hurt feelings as lesbians negotiate with possible donors, often discovering that the gay men they have in their sights are interested in hands-on parenting rather than a godparent role. One chapter is authored by five people who comprise a sort of parenting collective. Also included is a chapter rendered in comic book form. As this is a Canadian anthology, where same-sex marriages have been legal for several years, there’s less discussion of that debate than one would find in a comparable American collection. This proves a breath of fresh air: the editors take for granted the legitimacy of same-sex bonds and get on with the business of making babies and childrearing. The results are surprising, enlightening, and mandatory reading for any lesbians or gay men thinking of embarking on adventures in the wild world of parenthood.

See? Mandatory.


Waiting on my nighttable

There is, on my night table at this very moment, such a stack of possibility that I can barely contain myself every time I glance at it. It’s things like this that, of late, make me resent the real world, the one with its clients and deadlines and meals to be cooked and dishes washed and laundry folded, and aging, creaking bodies to be maintained. Some days (okay, a lot of days) I even resent showering. I want to play wildly with the children at the end of the day and then put them, happy, to bed and retreat, refreshed, to the couch — or to a bathtub more comfortable than ours with its straight up-and-down sides, obviously designed by a non-reader — and immerse myself in any and all of these books. And yet, they’ve sat there, some of them, for months. 

But no more! It’s spring, even if the thermometer dipped today back down to -15, and I am going to read. Here’s what’s in the stack: 

  • Foreskin’s Lament, by Shalom Auslander. Every time I hear this guy read one of his stories on National Public Radio’s This American Life, I want more. Angry, brutal, and astonishingly funny stories of growing up in — and eventually leaving — an ultra-Orthodox Jewish family and community.
  • Crisp, by R.W. Gray, known less formally in our circles as “Rob,” or our friendly resident sperm donor. I wonder if we would have chosen him after reading the book — the stories I’ve read thus far are full of fathers in trapped in burning cars and mothers who swell and swell and swell until they burst. I think we would have. Chosen him, that is.
  • A Gate at the Stairs, by Lorrie Moore. I know pretty much nothing about Moore, but her name just keeps popping up, spoken in reverential tones by people whose opinions I tend to admire. So I’m giving her a whirl.
  • The Book of Negroes, by Lawrence Hill. Rachel gave this to me for my birthday. I’m a few chapters in, and I get absolutely what all the fuss is about. Eager — and slightly scared — to continue.
  • Salt Physic, by Jacqueline Larson. A confession: I’m not the best or most avid reader of poetry, but these ones about skinny-dipping and the contours of a grandmother’s — and a lover’s — body and salt and sweat and cornflakes keep hooking me. I read a couple at a time, in stolen moments. Plus, Jacqueline now has what may be the world’s most freakishly adorable baby.
  • For the Time Being and An American Childhood, by Annie Dillard. If you teach a course in creative nonfiction, which I did this past fall, it is impossible to stop coming across paeans to Dillard as one of the genre’s founding and most talented voices. I grabbed these from a friend’s shelf to find out for myself. So far, I think I’m onto something.
  • Half World, by Hiromi Goto. I haven’t read anything of Goto’s since Chorus of Mushrooms. ’Bout time.

Under the books are Dwell magazine, my escape into slightly pretentious but oh so pretty modernist architecture and decor, and Bitch and Bust magazines, for, respectively, “a feminist response to pop culture” and “women with something to get off their chests.”

God, I used to read, as a child, a dozen or more books a week. Whatever happened between then and now, I’m not so sure has been entirely a good thing.

What books are waiting on your nightstand?


And now, a word from our sponsor

Rowan’s latest favourite pastime is playing the “Word Game,” which involves him typing messages to us on Rachel’s laptop, and then killing himself laughing as we read them. Mostly, he executes long strings of marriage proposals to his immediate family — including the cats — and several senior kindergarten classmates:

 Isaac would you like to marry me

Love rowan

Minou would you like to marry me

Love rowan

Rob would you like to marry me

Love rowan

Gryphon would   you like to marry me

Love rowan

Susan would you like to marry me

Love rowan

Rachel would you like to marry me

Love rowan

Then, every so often, things get a bit broodier. I would be slightly worried about the following if my would-be stalker wasn’t giggling so hard as he typed the following:

 I love you very moch so moch that i kant take it

Ene more

Susan i kant take it ene more love rowan

 And then, he gets downright adorable. Or, depending on my current level of cynicism, a bit Eddie Haskell-ish:

Susan and rachel  are the best moms in the hol world love rowan

And Isaac is mi kqtest letol brathre* in the hol world love rowan           

             *and Isaac is my cutest little brother

It’s interesting, though, what he chooses to put into print. I mean, perhaps this will come as a surprise to you, but if you transcribed a typical day, our household script would consist of a lot more than sticky-sweet compliments and declarations of undying — if potentially polygamous — love. In fact, I’m fairly certain that the phrases uttered most often chez nous are, “Sit on your bum, please” and “Close the fridge door,” followed closely by “Do you have to pee?” and “What’s the magic word?”

Oh, and, “We don’t have time.”

Which is not to say that we don’t try to skew the ratio of domestic statements heavily toward the positive, that we don’t remember to tell the kids how much we love them and how proud we are of them multiple times a day. We’re big on the philosophy of noticing — and remarking on — the good as much as — and preferably more than — the not-so-good, on the qualified yes rather than the outright no. But some days, or even some hours, it feels like there’s been a lot more “Hands to yourselves” or “Take your head out from under my shirt” than, “Of course I can read you a story” or “Come for a cuddle.”

But maybe that’s just me? Maybe I’m being too hard on myself — ignoring my own advice and noticing the negative more than the positive? Maybe — and this is what I hope is true — Rowan’s Word Games truly reflect his experience. Maybe he hears more love than sanction, more patience than exhaustion.

Or maybe, at the tender age of five, he’s already learning how to edit for the screen, for the page; how to mitigate the day-to-day realities of our lives to present a bright shiny face for the world, virtual and otherwise.

Wonder where he gets that from.


Backhand spring

A week ago, I was performing the quintessentially Thunder Bay action of shoveling my front lawn — trying to even out the piles of snow so that we wouldn’t be stuck again in April with a fossilized mountain of ice and dirt in the northeast corner of the front yard. But today? It’s mid-March, and all the snow is already gone. I find myself feeling oddly unprepared, as though dinner guests have arrived early and the house is still a disaster, the oven still cool to the touch. The little feedback loop inside my brain is saying things like We don’t have spring jackets for the kids yet, and Rowan’s bike needs repairs, and I have not planted any seeds indoors yet, and these kind of things make me feel as though I am late, not that spring is freakishly early, literally sprung upon us, still sleepy-eyed and coming out of hibernation.

In other words, the weather is my fault. How’s that for self-flagellation?

Not that I’m not enjoying it, the slipping on of sandals and following Rowan down the street on the season’s first ride on his mostly usable bicycle. And the kids, for them it’s like winter never happened. They don’t stop to marvel, like Rachel and I do, about the sudden greening of the grass in the backyard and the ability to kick around a soccer ball and the no snowsuits — NO SNOWSUITS! They just do it, in the moment, stripping off winter layers and letting them fall into the spring dirt.

Yesterday, after lunch, I met up with Rowan and Isaac and their babysitter at the park. It’s March break — spring break (and, to quote Rachel over at 6512 and Counting, “a good thing because gosh, those preschoolers have a rough schedule, what with snacktime and recess every two hours”). I met up with them at the park because we had signed Rowan up for gymnastics camp for four afternoons this week, on the assumption that since he loves his weekly gymnastics class and said “Yes” when we asked him, four weeks ago, if he would like to go to said camp, that this was a good idea.

You know where this is going, right? Should I just stop right here and not write any more? What about this: those of you who don’t really need to keep reading to know that, of course, when I showed up to bring him to gymnastics camp yesterday, when I showed up at the sunshiny park where he was merrily digging in the thawed sand with his brother, he didn’t want to go anywhere near gymnastics camp, you guys just go get a coffee or check your e-mail or something for a minute. And then the rest of you can hear about how he refused to get in the car even after I tried to bribe him with a yogurt tube, and so I left him with his babysitter and his brother and came home, defeated.

What was I going to do, I asked Rachel over the phone, short of physically forcing him into the vehicle and hurling him, screaming, onto a balance beam?

In truth, I wasn’t surprised. Since his initial embracing of the gymnastics camp idea, Rowan has steadily backpedaled. “I want to go to the babysitter’s every day,” he kept telling us. “I only go to gymnastics on Thursdays. I don’t want to go to gymnastics CAMP — just gymnastics. On Thursdays.” Still, we persevered, hoping that he might have a sudden change of heart. Why we persevered, I don’t know. We’ve been here, with swimming lessons, with indoor soccer, and now with gymnastics camp: Rowan knows what he wants, and what he likes. As he said to us at the dinner table last night, more calmly than he had in the park yesterday afternoon, “I’m sorry, but that’s just how I do things.”

On Thursdays.

So, we’ve shelved gymnastics camp. And, for some period of time that I cannot quite specify just yet, I’m shelving the idea of signing him up for any prepaid, organized activity. Because, my kid? My kid does what he does, when he does it, and it’s not worth the heartache to try to force him to do things he doesn’t do, when he doesn’t want to do them.

Maybe I would be more worried if he spent all day watching TV, if he wasn’t thrilled to go to gymnastics (on Thursdays) and music classes (on Mondays), if he didn’t want to play soccer in the backyard with us (as opposed to on the Astroturf of the indoor gym) or ride his bike every possible chance he got, if he didn’t read dozens of books weekly. Maybe I would be more worried if I didn’t recognize so much of myself in him. Despite my mother’s exhortations for me to take up what she hilariously called a “social sport” (does pool count?) I never learned to play golf or tennis and I don’t regret that for a minute. I refused to go when she signed me up for baseball, although I managed to swim competitively for years and, like my sons, loved gymnastics. I did — and I do — things how I do things. Why? Because I’m not a joiner. Hi! Look at me! Working by myself in my home office! For the past dozen years!

Still, as much as I recognize myself in Rowan, part of me — and I’m working hard to get over this part — still gets so frustrated at his refusals, still feels as though if I were just a better parent, he’d play indoor soccer and skip off to swimming lessons and gleefully jump in the car to go to gymnastics. Part of me wishes we could spring new things on him — travel, for example? — and that he would rise, gracefully, to the challenge.

But that’s not my boy. My boy does things the way he does them, and, like the weather, he does them neither early nor late but right on his own schedule. It’s not my fault, or his — it’s just how things are. And I can fret about them, or I can revel in the sun on my bare arms, my feet in sandals, my son pedaling his bike down the street, training wheels hovering over the pavement.

 PS: That said, any stories of commiseration most welcome.


What I found in my boot this morning, 2

Second in what (I assume will be an) ongoing series. Technically found in a Birkenstock slipper.


Swedish for “sleep when you’re dead”

Back in the days when IKEA charged a flat fee of $35 to deliver any amount of furniture anywhere in Canada, Rachel ordered an entire one-bedroom’s apartment worth of BILLY bookcases and EKTORP desks and other loveseats-with-names to furnish her apartment in Thunder Bay. Among those items was a double box spring and mattress set — I forget its name, so let’s just call it LARS — that she used for the year until I and the rest of our furniture moved up from the Big Smoke to join her. We put LARS in what would eventually be Rowan’s room and graduated to a queen-size Sealy Posturepedic of our own.

The thing is — as I remembered this morning, all snuggled up in what has become my five-year-old’s bed — LARS is the most comfortable bed in the house. Our Posturepedic is fine and all, but it does not have the Scandinavian je ne sais quoi, the perfect sleepability of LARS. LARS, like the baby bear’s bed, is just right. Plus, when a child arrives at one in the morning for a cuddle and subsequently settles in for the night, I really wish we had sprung for the king-size mattress. Things get a little crowded. Which is why, last night, I left Rachel and Rowan in the Sealy and decamped for LARS, quite happy to be ensconced underneath a sailboat comforter in a comfy bed all to myself.

At least, until 5:30 AM, when Isaac woke up to hurl abuse at me and needed resettling and Rachel stumbled into Rowan’s room to say she had been awake since three.

“Do you want to climb in here?” I asked, on my way out of bed to shush Isaac.

“No,” she said. “Well, yes.” And she snuggled up in LARS while I got to go listen to the two-year-old complaint department gripe that I wasn’t Rachel and where was Rachel and he wanted Rachel not me so I should just go in the garbage. Which I took as my cue to return to Rachel and LARS, for another 45 minutes. “This is the garbage,” I told her, and we both fell back to sleep.

Things could be worse, though. These days, Isaac is more or less sleeping through the night again, after an incredibly tedious few months of waking twice or three times and calling out for us. We finally dealt with that problem, however, with the highly controversial technique of RIDING IT OUT AND WAITING TO SEE IF THINGS WOULD CHANGE ALL BY THEMSELVES. Which they did. I’m going to write a best-selling book about how you can do that with your two-year-old, too.

Funny, though, how much things have changed when it comes to sleep. In my parenting incarnation of a few years, or even months, back, I would have been planning, strategizing, spending the precious little energy I have left coming up with a plan, A PLAN, to get the baby to sleep. I would have been trading off nights with Rachel in the basement in order to ensure that we were both at least half-rested.

At this point, though, we seem to be wise enough — and well-rested enough, and, let’s not forget, healthy enough — that we can take the stretches of interrupted nights more or less in stride. I chalk it up partly to increased levels of Zen, but also fatality: what, really, could we have done to prevent the child from waking up? And what else was there to do but help get him back to sleep? And then go back to sleep ourselves, wherever and however we could? I like it, this new Zen. It’s so much better than hysteria. Really, it’s just — and don’t kill me for this one — common sense.


“Did you miss them?”

“Mom?”

Part of me sighs inwardly — maybe even, I will admit, outwardly — as Rowan props himself up on one elbow and opens his eyes to ask yet one more pre-sleep question. I’m tired. He’s tired. There have been lots of questions already.

“Yes, sweetie?” But I’ll humour him. Because this is the time of day — cuddled up in bed — where he is sometimes most conversational, most able to engage in the back-and-forth of real dialogue as opposed to his usual running-roughshod monologue and random series of segues.

“What did you do after you were borned?”

My mind struggles to process the question. Does he mean the first-breath minutes after delivery? The shift from womb to air and from umbilicus to bottles? (Confession: I was not breast-fed, and still managed to grow to functional adulthood.) From infancy to toddlerhood and so forth?

And then I think I might understand what he means.

“Well, I lived in my house with my parents — your Bubbie Ruthi and Zaidie — and with Uncle Jeff, and I got bigger and bigger and I learned to talk and walk, and I went to school and I grew up.”

Rowan is silent, so I continue.

“And then,” I say brightly, “I got my own house” — actually, a tiny, attic apartment with sloping ceilings, just north of College Street near Dufferin in Toronto’s west end — “and then Rachel and I got our house together. And we moved to Thunder Bay, and had you! And Isaac!”

That’s the gist of it, more or less: my life after I was borned, give or take a few apartments and a couple of degrees and so forth. But it will do at 8:15 on a school night, I think.

“Did you miss them?”

Did I miss who? Again, it takes me a moment to figure out what he’s asking. Oh!  

“Do you mean did I miss Bubbie Ruthi and Zaidie and Uncle Jeff when I got my own house?”

“Yeah.”

“Well,” I say, hedging a bit — not quite sure how to explain to him that my brother and I (Hi, Jeff!) developed a healthy regard for each other mostly after we both left home, or that leaving the suburbs of suburban Toronto for McGill University and Montréal’s plateau neighborhood was the best possible thing I could have done, not because home was a bad place, but because the plateau was just so good, so necessary for me as a sheltered, bored, somewhat morose 18-year-old “well, sometimes. But whenever I missed them I could always phone them or go visit them. Or they came to visit me. I left when I was ready to.”

Rowan’s eyes are large, liquid. I’m talking and watching his jawline soften, melt, still racing to keep up with his thought process and wondering what he’s getting at when I finally figure it out.

“Are you worried about missing us when you leave home?”

He nods and gulps and the tears spill over. “I don’t want to miss you and Rachel and Isaac! I want to live with you forever!”

Let me be clear: there are no plans afoot for Rowan to move out, no plans for everyone to live anywhere but here. Rowan lets us know at regular intervals that he intends to live with us, in this house, for his entire life — even after he has the seven children he is planning to have. He would like to marry me, or Rachel, or, in a pinch, Isaac, and we explain that this is not possible, that marriage, should he choose to embrace that particular institution, is about making families bigger, adding to them, bringing in new people to the mix. We tell him that he may change his mind and choose to live with his spouse and their seven children in a different house, and he says, “But you’ll come live in that house with me.” And we say, maybe. And then he says, again, “I’m going to live here forever.” And we say, again, “Of course you are, for as long as you want.” And then he says, “But do I still have to follow the rules?” And I say, “Yes,” and he says, “Even when I’m 12?” And I say, “Yes,” and he says, “Even when I’m 50?” and I say, “Mister, if you’re living in my house with me when you’re 50, you especially have to follow the rules.”

“Sweetheart,” I say, pulling him to me, “nobody’s leaving. Nobody’s leaving for a long, long time.”

“I don’t want them ever to,” he wails, shuddering.

And we go on like this for a little while, him calming down slowly, until he is near sleep, until I can leave his bedroom, lights dimmed, and go downstairs to shrug my shoulders and shake my head, bewildered, at Rachel, as we try to process Rowan’s advance grieving.

Which is why I’m slightly ambivalent about reading Nicola I. Campbell’s Shin-chi’s Canoe with him. Because here’s a book about the unthinkable, a true story about boys and girls taken away — before they’re ready, before they’re old enough — from their homes, their siblings, their parents. The book tells the story of Shin-chi and his older sister, Shi-shi-etko, as they are taken from their families and communities; from their bedtime stories and language and food; from their names and their games and the arms of their parents to Indian residential school: a cold, foreign, hungry world designed to annihilate them under the guise of saving them.

Rachel has ordered the book and it has arrived and we have put it with all the other books. Waiting until the right moment, which means waiting until Rowan takes it out one day and asks to hear the story. I don’t want to tell it, not sure he’s ready for it or will be able to handle it, especially given his fears of leaving home. But I don’t want the story left untold. And I don’t imagine there’s ever going to be a convenient time to tell it.

I let Rachel do the reading, because she has read it already and imagines that she will be able to stay (fairly) calm, whereas I know I will begin to weep immediately, unstoppably, the moment the story begins. Which I do, as the siblings sit with their parents and grandmother and baby sister, waiting for the cattle truck to appear. Which I do through the cutting off of their braids (Shi-shi-etko asks her grandmother to cut their hair to avoid the indignity of having it hacked off by the nuns and priests at the school), through the end-of-summer journey through familiar landscape to, a hard, new, unfamiliar place of hunger and prayer to foreign gods. I weep through the spring and the return — temporary — home to their families and a dugout canoe of their own. The story is beautifully told and spares us the worst details, the outright violence and assault of the system. But it’s brutal enough, even geared towards children.

Rowan is confused. “Why did they do that?” he keeps asking. “The people who took the children away — why did they do that?” And, “what happened to them because they did that?” When he asks where, we tell him, here, right here. On this land. Not any more, but not so very long ago — as the book tells us, the last government-operated residential school in Canada did not close until 1996. And he says, “I don’t want them to do that here! I want them to do that somewhere else” — and he thinks of the place he imagines is furthest away from him — “in … in China! Not here!” And (as my mind flashes to the thousands — millions? — of baby girls given up in that country, other countries) we try to explain that we don’t want children to be taken from their parents, anywhere.

This is a child who has never known hunger, whose parents have spent all of three nights away from him his entire life, never more than a cell phone call or short flight away. And yet who is so spooked at the thought of leaving us that he can’t fathom that this happened all the time. And why should he? That kind of thing — it won’t happen to us, right? We’ll all get to live together in our house, until we’re good and ready not to?

Probably we will. But my son, my sons, need to understand that their own human rights — and sometimes, their lack thereof — have a long history in this country, and that the horrors perpetrated in Indian residential schools have an important, ongoing, chapter in that history. They need to know that their story is tangled up in those of the First Nations in this country; that important, horrific injustices were perpetrated; and that one way to prevent further injustice and possibly further some form of healing is to learn the history, tell the stories. Everyone’s stories. No matter how much they hurt. They need to know that no one is safe unless everyone is safe.

So, we can all — my two kids and their two moms —  live here together, forever? That’s what I tell my kid as I tuck him into bed after the story. Mostly, I believe it’s true.

Mostly. 

 


Crispy goodness

So I’m going to write about somebody else’s book, for a change. This book, in fact:

Isn’t it pretty? It’s Crisp, Rob’s collection of short stories (Who is Rob? Read this.), and they are beautifully creepy, glittering-up-at-you-from-the-bulk-candy-bins mouthfuls of magic realism. They are, as Rob puts it, about “grief, disappointment, and the occasional dinner party gone wrong.” And I don’t think he means like “the dessert burned” wrong. (Although the best part of this book may be that Rob is entertaining my under-exercised five-year-old in the basement as I write these very words. Go, team!)

We’ve all been waiting impatiently for this particular baby to be born, and now it’s here. And those of you lucky enough to live in Thunder Bay are invited to its debut launch, tomorrow evening (that’s March 4), 8 PM, at Calico Coffeehouse. They do a mean book launch, let me tell you. I’ll be the girl behind the book table. See you there!


Again with the book

Hey — JD Drummond over at The Dominion has written a great review of And Baby Makes More: Known Donors, Queer Parents and Our Unexpected Families. Quoth JD: “The stories in this collection are loud and inspiring examples of courage, creativity and love in queer parenting. I knew these people existed somewhere — the queers who make their dreams of babies and families come true, in the queerest of ways.  … this book succeeds in the most urgent of its aims: creating a space for these stories to be heard.”